Shimano Spheros SW A 10000 PGX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Spheros SW A

Seafishing

61.20 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classMedium

Durability8 out of 10

Ergonomics5.44 out of 10

Gear ratio4.9:1

Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs

Weight675g / 23.81oz

Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch

Ball bearings4+1

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSeafishing
Price range~ €149.33
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size10000 PG
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/300

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)

Spinning

85.50 out of 100

Value for money4.5 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability8.53 out of 10

Ergonomics6.42 out of 10

Gear ratio5.8:1

Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs

Weight175g / 6.17oz

Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €159.80
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2000S-H
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150

Conclusion

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX clearly outshines Shimano Spheros SW A 10000 PGX, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch) and total score (8.55 out of 10). While Shimano Spheros SW A 10000 PGX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.

What's the difference between Shimano Spheros SW A and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX

When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles