Shimano Spheros SW A 6000 HGX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Spheros SW A
Seafishing
49.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.97 out of 10
Ergonomics5.76 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight450g / 15.87oz
Line retireve per crank103 centimeter / 40.55 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €144.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/240

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
38.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank74 centimeter / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €23.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/200
Conclusion
Both Shimano Spheros SW A 6000 HGX and Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score. If you must choose between them, Shimano Spheros SW A 6000 HGX offers a slight edge in durability, while Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Shimano Spheros SW A and Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF?
Shimano Spheros SW A 6000 HGX
- At 5 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the drag is on the lighter side—suitable for smaller saltwater species or finesse-style presentations
- Built tough for the salt, ideal for seafishing.
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.57 out of 10 (74 centimeter / 29.13 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 HGX


Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 HGX vs Daiwa Emblem Surf 45 SCW Type R


Daiwa 21 Certate SW 10000-HX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 HGX


Shimano Spheros SW A 18000 HGX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 HGX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 XGX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 HGX


Shimano TLD 15X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X


Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX vs Shimano Spheros SW A 5000 XGX


Shimano Spheros SW A 18000 HGX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X vs Daiwa 24 Certate SW 4000-XHX


Shimano Spheros SW A 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 24 Certate SW 4000-XHX vs Shimano Spheros SW A 5000 XGX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 Certate SW 4000-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X
