Shimano Spheros SW A 18000 HGX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Spheros SW A
Seafishing
59.10 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.56 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag18kg / 39.68lbs
Weight920g / 32.45oz
Line retireve per crank129 centimeter / 50.79 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €169.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size18000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.52/310

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €655.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX clearly outshines Shimano Spheros SW A 18000 HGX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.2:1) and weight (200g / 7,05oz). While Shimano Spheros SW A 18000 HGX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Spheros SW A and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Shimano Spheros SW A 18000 HGX
- Scoring 8 out of 10 (4+1), the reel runs smooth under pressure
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.67 out of 10 (200g / 7,05oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R vs Daiwa BG MQ 20000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R


Daiwa BG MQ 20000X vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 10000-PX


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 10000-PX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX


Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Daiwa 24 Certate SW 6000-HX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 5000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 18000-HX


Daiwa 21 Certate SW (G) 5000-XHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R


Daiwa 21 Certate SW (G) 5000-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 10000-PX


Daiwa 21 Certate SW (G) 5000-XHX vs Daiwa 24 Certate SW 6000-HX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Shimano Ultegra C3000DX


Daiwa BG MQ 20000X vs Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R


Daiwa 21 Certate SW (G) 5000-XHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX


Daiwa 24 Certate SW 6000-HX vs Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 10000-PX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 5000 HGX


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 10000-PX vs Daiwa BG MQ 20000X


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 10000-PX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X
