Shimano Stella FK 1000X vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R

Shimano Stella FK
Spinning
85.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings12+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €579.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 140/0.14

Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
Spinning
29.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.99 out of 10
Ergonomics2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight320g / 11.29oz
Line retireve per crank76cm / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €49.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 DH
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160
Conclusion
Shimano Stella FK 1000X clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and total score (8.5 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Stella FK 1000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Stella FK and Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R?
Shimano Stella FK 1000X
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- With a score like 8.87 out of 10 (170g / 6oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76cm / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa BG 3500X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX


Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX


Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X


Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX
