Shimano Stella FK 1000X vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R

Shimano Stella FK
Spinning
85.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings12+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €579.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 140/0.14

Shimano Sahara 2500 R
Spinning
38.50 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.96 out of 10
Ergonomics4.08 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight275g / 9.70oz
Line retireve per crank76cm / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €47.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160
Conclusion
Shimano Stella FK 1000X clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 2500 R, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and total score (8.5 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 2500 R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Stella FK 1000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Stella FK and Shimano Sahara 2500 R?
Shimano Stella FK 1000X
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Sahara 2500 R
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76cm / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Delphin CarbonIX 1000X


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Delphin CarbonIX 1000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Delphin CarbonIX 1000X


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Delphin CarbonIX 1000X
