Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Stella FK
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings12+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €599.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 S HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 120/0.16

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight305g / 10.76oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €189.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX and Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X stands out for a ball bearings of 8. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Stella FK and Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD?
Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
- With a ball bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Daiwa BG 3500X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Delphin REDIX
