Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Stella FK
Spinning
87.30 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank70 centimeter / 27.56 inch
Ball bearings12+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €593.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 120/0.12

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32
Conclusion
Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.1:1) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Stella FK and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8,82lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX
