Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Stella FK
Spinning
87.30 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank70 centimeter / 27.56 inch
Ball bearings12+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €593.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 120/0.12

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300
Conclusion
Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX edges out Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 with slightly better overall performance, especially on the weight (205g / 7,23oz) and the durability (9.5 out of 10). Still, Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 holds its own with strengths like a maximum drag of 15kg / 33,07lbs and a line retrieve per crank of 68 centimeter / 26.77 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Stella FK and Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000?
Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.63 out of 10 (205g / 7,23oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX
