Shimano Stella FK 2500X vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF

Shimano Stella FK
Spinning
93.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings12+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €593.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 160/0.16

Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
Spinning
51.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.7 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.5:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank95 centimeter / 37.4 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/270
Conclusion
Shimano Stella FK 2500X clearly outshines Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Stella FK 2500X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Stella FK and Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF?
Shimano Stella FK 2500X
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.6 out of 10 (210g / 7,41oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500X


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX


Shimano Stella FK 2500X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX


Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X


Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX
