Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Stella FK
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings12+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €599.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 M
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 120/0.12

Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
91.10 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag380kg / 837.76lbs
Weight380g / 13404oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33858 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €249.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4012QD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX and Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX offers a weight of 260g / 9,17oz, while Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD stands out for a ball bearings of 8. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Stella FK and Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD?
Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX
- With a score like 8.27 out of 10 (260g / 9,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD
- With a ball bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Similar comparisons

Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X


Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Delphin BRONZ 3000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX
