Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Stella FK
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings12+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €599.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 M
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 120/0.12

Daiwa Tanacom 500
Multireels
70.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank46 centimeter / 18.11 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €489.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/420
Conclusion
Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX clearly outshines Daiwa Tanacom 500, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch) and gear ratio (5.3:1). While Daiwa Tanacom 500 may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Stella FK and Daiwa Tanacom 500?
Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.27 out of 10 (260g / 9,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 8.2 out of 10 (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Catana 1000 RC vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Shimano Catana 1000 RC


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX
