Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X

Shimano Stella FK
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings12+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €599.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 M
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 120/0.12

Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG
Spinning
48.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.67 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €29.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/200
Conclusion
Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX clearly outshines Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and line retrieve per crank (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch). While Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Stella FK and Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG?
Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 8.2 out of 10 (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X vs Delphin HORNET 50X


Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Delphin HORNET 50X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX


Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 500X


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX
