Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Stella FK
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank101 centimeter / 39.76 inch
Ball bearings12+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €599.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 130/0.13

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.04 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €187.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2508
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX and Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX offers a line retrieve per crank of 101 centimeter / 39.76 inch, while Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X stands out for a ball bearings of 8. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Stella FK and Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD?
Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X
- With a ball bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Daiwa GS LTD 3000X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Delphin REDIX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Delphin REDIX


Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX


Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X
