Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Stella FK
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank101 centimeter / 39.76 inch
Ball bearings12+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €599.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 130/0.13

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
91.10 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight395g / 13.93oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €199.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX and Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX offers a weight of 260g / 9,17oz, while Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X stands out for a ball bearings of 8. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Stella FK and Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD?
Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX
- With a score like 8.27 out of 10 (260g / 9,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X
- With a ball bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Similar comparisons

Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Delphin RAYA body


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Delphin REDIX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X
