Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF

Shimano Stella FK
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings12+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €599.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000 M HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 125/0.13

Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
Spinning
51.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.7 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.5:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank95 centimeter / 37.4 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/270
Conclusion
Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX clearly outshines Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Stella FK and Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF?
Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.6 out of 10 (210g / 7,41oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Mitchell 308 2000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Shimano Super 4000 GT RD


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX vs Shimano Super 4000 GT RD


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX
