Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X

Shimano Stella FK
Spinning
84.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings12+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €599.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 130/0.13

Delphin MonoDRAG
Spinning
57.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.73 out of 10
Ergonomics6 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €33.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/215
Conclusion
Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX clearly outshines Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and line retrieve per crank (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch). While Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Stella FK and Delphin MonoDRAG?
Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 8.9 out of 10 (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X


Shimano Aero C5000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX


Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Shimano Aero C5000X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX
