Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX

Shimano Stella FK
Spinning
84.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings12+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €599.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 130/0.13

Shimano 21 Nexave FI
Spinning
59.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.91 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight305g / 10.76oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €44.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Conclusion
Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX clearly outshines Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and weight (210g / 7,41oz). While Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Stella FK and Shimano 21 Nexave FI?
Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX
- With a score like 8.6 out of 10 (210g / 7,41oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX
- A fast gear ratio of 9.2 out of 10 (5.8:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Shimano Super 4000 GT RD


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X


Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Daiwa BG 5000X


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX


Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX


Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX


Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Shimano Super 4000 GT RD


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI
