Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X

Shimano Stella FK
Spinning
84.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings12+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €599.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 130/0.13

Shimano Catana FE
Spinning
49.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.67 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank66 centimeter / 25.98 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €30.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/170
Conclusion
Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX clearly outshines Shimano Catana FE 1000X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and line retrieve per crank (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch). While Shimano Catana FE 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Stella FK and Shimano Catana FE?
Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX
- 8.9 out of 10 (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Catana FE 1000X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX


Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX


Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX


Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX


Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX


Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Delphin IXTREK 2000X


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Delphin IXTREK 2000X


Delphin IXTREK 2000X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX
