Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX vs Shimano Sedona 500 FI

Shimano Stella FK
Spinning
84.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings12+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €599.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 130/0.13

Shimano Sedona 500 FI
Spinning
54.70 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag3kg / 7 lbs
Weight180g / 6.3oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/110 lb/yds: 2/190. 4/100, 6/60
Conclusion
Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX clearly outshines Shimano Sedona 500 FI, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and line retrieve per crank (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch). While Shimano Sedona 500 FI may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Stella FK and Shimano Sedona 500 FI?
Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX
- 8.9 out of 10 (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Sedona 500 FI
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.8 out of 10 (5.6:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX


Daiwa BG 2000X vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X vs Daiwa BG 2000X


Daiwa BG 1500X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX


Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa BG 2000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX
