Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX

Shimano Stradic FM

Spinning

1000fmx

77.40 out of 100

Value for money4.5 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability8.5 out of 10

Ergonomics6.38 out of 10

Gear ratio5.1:1

Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs

Weight185g / 6.53oz

Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch

Ball bearings6+1

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €144.33
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size-
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/140

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT

Spinning

80.00 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability4.66 out of 10

Ergonomics6.42 out of 10

Gear ratio5.8:1

Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs

Weight175g / 6.17oz

Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €199.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2000 S-H
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150

Conclusion

Both Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX and Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX offers a durability of 8.5 out of 10, while Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX stands out for a gear ratio of 5.8:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.

What's the difference between Shimano Stradic FM and Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT?

Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX

Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX

When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles