Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX

Shimano Stradic FM
Spinning
1000fmx
77.40 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight185g / 6.53oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €144.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/140

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT
Spinning
78.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.65 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.3 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €196.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX and Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX offers a maximum drag of 3kg / 6,61lbs, while Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 82 centimeter / 32.3 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Stradic FM and Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT?
Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.3 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX


Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX


Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX


Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X
