Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX

Shimano Stradic FM

Spinning

1000fmx

77.40 out of 100

Value for money4.5 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability8.5 out of 10

Ergonomics6.38 out of 10

Gear ratio5.1:1

Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs

Weight185g / 6.53oz

Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch

Ball bearings6+1

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €144.33
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size-
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/140

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)

Spinning

85.50 out of 100

Value for money4.5 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability8.53 out of 10

Ergonomics6.42 out of 10

Gear ratio5.8:1

Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs

Weight175g / 6.17oz

Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €159.80
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2000S-H
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150

Conclusion

Both Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX offers a ball bearings of 6+1, while Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX stands out for a gear ratio of 5.8:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.

What's the difference between Shimano Stradic FM and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX

When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles