Shimano Stradic SWB 4000XGX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Stradic SWB
Seafishing
63.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.61 out of 10
Ergonomics5.97 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank101 centimeter / 39.76 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €183.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
74.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.52 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5.2kg / 11,46lbs
Weight143g / 5.04oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.17/170
Conclusion
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX edges out Shimano Stradic SWB 4000XGX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (5.2:1) and the line retrieve per crank (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch). Still, Shimano Stradic SWB 4000XGX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 7 and a maximum drag of 11kg / 24,25lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Stradic SWB and Abu GARCIA Zenon?
Shimano Stradic SWB 4000XGX
- At 5.41 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the drag is on the lighter side—suitable for smaller saltwater species or finesse-style presentations
- With a fast retrieve 7, the reel helps you stay on top of fast runs and cover water efficiently
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 10000-PX


Shimano Stradic SWB 6000XGX vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW 10000-HX


Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Shimano Stradic SWB 6000XGX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 20000-HX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 10000-PX


Shimano Stradic SWB 6000XGX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 XGX


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 20000-HX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX


Daiwa 21 Certate SW 10000-HX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX


Daiwa Emblem Surf 45 SCW Type R vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 8000 HGX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 XGX vs Daiwa BG MQ 8000-HX


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 10000-PX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X


Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 XGX


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX vs Daiwa Emblem Surf 45 SCW Type R


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 XGX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX
