Shimano Stradic SWB 4000XGX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Stradic SWB

Seafishing

63.40 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability8.61 out of 10

Ergonomics5.97 out of 10

Gear ratio6.2:1

Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs

Weight300g / 10.58oz

Line retireve per crank101 centimeter / 39.76 inch

Ball bearings7

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSeafishing
Price range~ €183.33
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size4000XG
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Shimano Sahara FJ

Spinning

65.00 out of 100

Value for money3 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability7 out of 10

Ergonomics6.12 out of 10

Gear ratio5.0:1

Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs

Weight265g / 9.35oz

Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch

Ball bearings4+1

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €63.33
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel sizeC 3000 DH
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210

Conclusion

Both Shimano Stradic SWB 4000XGX and Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Stradic SWB 4000XGX offers a durability of 8.61 out of 10, while Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX stands out for a gear ratio of 5.0:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.

What's the difference between Shimano Stradic SWB and Shimano Sahara FJ?

Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX

Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles