Shimano Stradic SWB 4000XGX vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Stradic SWB

Seafishing

63.40 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability8.61 out of 10

Ergonomics5.97 out of 10

Gear ratio6.2:1

Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs

Weight300g / 10.58oz

Line retireve per crank101 centimeter / 39.76 inch

Ball bearings7

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSeafishing
Price range~ €183.33
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size4000XG
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Shimano Sahara 500 FI

Spinning

44.20 out of 100

Value for money2.5 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability3 out of 10

Ergonomics6.42 out of 10

Gear ratio6.2:1

Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.52 lbs

Weight175g / 6.17oz

Line retireve per crank69cm / 27.17 inch

Ball bearings4 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €62.00
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size500
Handle typeHandle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/110 lb/yds: 2/190. 4/100, 6/60

Conclusion

Shimano Stradic SWB 4000XGX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 500 FI, offering significantly better performance in durability (8.61 out of 10) and total score (6.34 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 500 FI may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Stradic SWB 4000XGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.

What's the difference between Shimano Stradic SWB and Shimano Sahara 500 FI?

Shimano Stradic SWB 4000XGX

At 5.41 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the drag is on the lighter side—suitable for smaller saltwater species or finesse-style presentations
Built tough for the salt, ideal for seafishing.