Shimano Stradic SWB 6000HGX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Stradic SWB
Seafishing
63.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.73 out of 10
Ergonomics5.76 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag13kg / 28.66lbs
Weight450g / 15.87oz
Line retireve per crank103 centimeter / 40.55 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €219.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/190

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
74.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.52 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5.2kg / 11,46lbs
Weight143g / 5.04oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.17/170
Conclusion
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX edges out Shimano Stradic SWB 6000HGX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (5.2:1) and the line retrieve per crank (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch). Still, Shimano Stradic SWB 6000HGX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 7 and a maximum drag of 13kg / 28,66lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Stradic SWB and Abu GARCIA Zenon?
Shimano Stradic SWB 6000HGX
- A drag score of 6.22 out of 10 (13kg / 28,66lbs) provides solid stopping power for typical inshore or light offshore fishing
- With a fast retrieve 7, the reel helps you stay on top of fast runs and cover water efficiently
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X


Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 10000-HX vs Delphin SHARX 4000X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 6000HGX


Shimano TLD 20X vs Daiwa BG MQ 8000-HX


Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 6000D-HX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 6000HGX


Shimano Stradic SWB 10000HGX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 6000HGX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 10000-HX vs Shimano TLD 20X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Daiwa 23 Saltiga 6000-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 10000-HX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X


Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 6000D-HX vs Daiwa BG MQ 8000-HX


Daiwa BG MQ 8000-HX vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW 10000-HX


Daiwa 21 Certate SW 10000-HX vs Daiwa 23 Saltiga 6000-XHX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X vs Daiwa 23 Saltiga 6000-XHX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Shimano TLD 20X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Daiwa BG MQ 8000-HX


Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 6000D-HX vs Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R
