Shimano Stradic SWB 6000HGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Stradic SWB
Seafishing
63.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.73 out of 10
Ergonomics5.76 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag13kg / 28.66lbs
Weight450g / 15.87oz
Line retireve per crank103 centimeter / 40.55 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €219.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/190

Daiwa 23 NINJA LT
Spinning
55.90 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight365g / 12.88oz
Line retireve per crank92 centimeter / 36.22 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €59.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeLT6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Stradic SWB 6000HGX and Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Stradic SWB 6000HGX offers a durability of 8.73 out of 10, while Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 92 centimeter / 36.22 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Stradic SWB and Daiwa 23 NINJA LT?
Shimano Stradic SWB 6000HGX
- Scoring 8.71 out of 10 (450g / 15,87oz), this reel is lighter than expected for a saltwater model, which helps on long sessions without extra strain
- Built tough for the salt, ideal for seafishing.
Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- 8.7 out of 10 (92 centimeter / 36.22 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 Certate SW 5000-HX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 Certate SW 5000-HX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Daiwa 21 Certate SW 10000-HX vs Shimano TLD 15X


Daiwa 21 Certate SW 10000-HX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 Saltiga 4000-HX vs Daiwa 24 Certate SW 5000-HX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X vs Daiwa BG MQ 6000D-HX


Daiwa 23 Saltiga 6000-HX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 PGX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 PGX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 Saltiga 4000-HX


Daiwa 21 Certate SW 10000-PX vs Shimano TLD 15X


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 PGX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW 10000-PX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 Certate SW 5000-HX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 Certate SW 5000-HX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW 10000-PX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 PGX vs Daiwa 23 Saltiga 6000-HX


Shimano TLD 15X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 PGX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX
