Shimano Stradic SWB 6000XGX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.
Shimano Stradic SWB
Seafishing
64.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.73 out of 10
Ergonomics5.76 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag13kg / 28.66lbs
Weight450g / 15.87oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €219.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/190
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT
Feeder And Match
3000-c (match)x
63.10 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.98 out of 10
Ergonomics6.06 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05 lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €49.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C (Match)
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Stradic SWB 6000XGX and Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Stradic SWB 6000XGX offers a durability of 8.73 out of 10, while Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X stands out for a gear ratio of 5.3:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Stradic SWB and Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT?
Shimano Stradic SWB 6000XGX
- Built tough for the salt, ideal for seafishing.
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X
- This reel ensures a smooth and efficient retrieve, great for consistent casting and control in feeder and match fishing
- This reel provides steady retrieval 80 centimeter / 31.5 inch (6.43 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
Similar comparisons
Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 5000 HGX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X
Shimano Spheros SW SP3000XGSWX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD
Cormoran Big Cat 5PiF vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 5000 HGX
Cormoran Big Cat 5PiF vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX
Shimano TLD 15X vs Daiwa BG MQ 3000D-XHX
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 5000 HGX
Shimano TLD 15X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX
Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 5000 HGX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Cormoran Big Cat 5PiF
Shimano TLD 15X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX
Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 HGX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X
Cormoran Big Cat 5PiF vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X
Daiwa BG MQ 2500-HX vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW 18000-HX
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX
Shimano Stradic SWB 10000HGX vs Shimano TLD 15X
Daiwa 21 Certate SW 18000-HX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X
Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX
Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X