Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano TLD II A

Multireels

88.50 out of 100

Value for money4.5 out of 5

Quality classExcellent

Durability9.5 out of 10

Ergonomics3.4 out of 10

Gear ratio3.5:1 / 1.4:1

Maximum drag42kg / 92.59lbs

Weight1625g / 57.32oz

Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch

Ball bearings4

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelMultireels
Price range~ €285.33
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size50 II LRSA
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeLever drag
Handle orientationRight
Line capacity monofil-

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT

Spinning

55.40 out of 100

Value for money3.5 out of 5

Quality classMedium

Durability7.69 out of 10

Ergonomics6.23 out of 10

Gear ratio4.7:1

Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs

Weight230g / 8.11oz

Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €89.33
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size4000-CP
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Conclusion

Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX clearly outshines Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (96 centimeter / 37.8 inch) and total score (8.85 out of 10). While Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.

What's the difference between Shimano TLD II A and Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT?

Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX

For a score of 5 out of 10 (3.5:1 / 1.4:1) in gear ratio, the reel leans towards power over speed, making it handy when you need that extra muscle during tough fights