Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano TLD II A

Multireels

88.50 out of 100

Value for money4.5 out of 5

Quality classExcellent

Durability9.5 out of 10

Ergonomics3.4 out of 10

Gear ratio3.5:1 / 1.4:1

Maximum drag42kg / 92.59lbs

Weight1625g / 57.32oz

Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch

Ball bearings4

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelMultireels
Price range~ €285.33
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size50 II LRSA
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeLever drag
Handle orientationRight
Line capacity monofil-

Penn Battle III Long Cast

Spinning

8000 Lcx

53.60 out of 100

Value for money3.5 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability4.59 out of 10

Ergonomics4 out of 10

Gear ratio4.0:1

Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs

Weight748g / 26.39oz

Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandPENN
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €177.40
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size8000 LC
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/485

Conclusion

Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX clearly outshines Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and total score (8.85 out of 10). While Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.

What's the difference between Shimano TLD II A and Penn Battle III Long Cast?

Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX

For a score of 5 out of 10 (3.5:1 / 1.4:1) in gear ratio, the reel leans towards power over speed, making it handy when you need that extra muscle during tough fights
Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.