Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF

Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio6.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank89 centimeter / 35.04 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €409.40
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/85

Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
Spinning
51.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.7 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.5:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank95 centimeter / 37.4 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/270
Conclusion
Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG clearly outshines Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG and Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF?
Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.57 out of 10 (215g / 7,58oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X


Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Delphin IXPERA 2000X


Delphin INKS 6000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX


Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Delphin INKS 6000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Delphin SHARX 4000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX vs Delphin SHARX 4000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X
