Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.
Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio6.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank89 centimeter / 35.04 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €409.40
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/85
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.04 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €187.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2508
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG and Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X stands out for a ball bearings of 8. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG and Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD?
Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X
- With a ball bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Similar comparisons
Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX
Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X
Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX
Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X
Delphin INKS 6000X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD
Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD
Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF
Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Delphin INKS 6000X
Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX
Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Penn Battle III 6000X
Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD
Penn Battle III 6000X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X
Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X
Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX
Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX
Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Penn Battle III 6000X
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX