Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Delphin INKS 2000X

Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio6.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank89 centimeter / 35.04 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €409.40
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/85

Delphin INKS
Spinning
54.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €21.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/400
Conclusion
Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG clearly outshines Delphin INKS 2000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and line retrieve per crank (89 centimeter / 35.04 inch). While Delphin INKS 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG and Delphin INKS?
Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 8.4 out of 10 (89 centimeter / 35.04 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Delphin INKS 2000X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X vs Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X


Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Delphin IXTREK 2000X


Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sienna 1000X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Shimano Super 4000 GT RD


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX vs Delphin SHARX 3000X


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX


Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI


Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX


Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX


Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX
