Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Delphin INKS 3000X

Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio6.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank89 centimeter / 35.04 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €409.40
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/85

Delphin INKS
Spinning
54.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.55 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/420
Conclusion
Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG clearly outshines Delphin INKS 3000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and line retrieve per crank (89 centimeter / 35.04 inch). While Delphin INKS 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG and Delphin INKS?
Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 8.4 out of 10 (89 centimeter / 35.04 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Delphin INKS 3000X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Delphin INKS 6000X vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X


Delphin IXTREK 3000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X


Delphin HORNET 30X vs Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Shimano 19 Stella 30000X


Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX vs Delphin HORNET 30X


Delphin HORNET 30X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX


Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Delphin IXTREK 3000X


Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX vs Delphin INKS 6000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Shimano 19 Stella 30000X


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX


Delphin IXTREK 3000X vs Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX
