Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Delphin INKS 4000X

Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio6.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank89 centimeter / 35.04 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €409.40
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/85

Delphin INKS
Spinning
56.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.57 out of 10
Ergonomics6.07 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight280g / 9.88oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €23.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/470
Conclusion
Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG clearly outshines Delphin INKS 4000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and line retrieve per crank (89 centimeter / 35.04 inch). While Delphin INKS 4000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG and Delphin INKS?
Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 8.4 out of 10 (89 centimeter / 35.04 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Delphin INKS 4000X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX vs Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI


Daiwa BG 4000X vs Shimano Ultegra C3000DX


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag


Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX vs Delphin SHARX 3000X


Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa BG 4000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sienna 2500X


Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X vs Shimano Sienna 2500X


Daiwa BG 4000X vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X


Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX vs Shimano Sienna 2500X
