Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Talica 20II CAM
Multireels
20ii Camx
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.64 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1 / 3.1:1
Maximum drag20kg / 44.09lbs
Weight920g / 32.45oz
Line retireve per crank104cm / 56cm
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €499.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size20II CAM
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofil-

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €649.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX and Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX offers a ball bearings of 6+1, while Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX stands out for a weight of 200g / 7,05oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Talica 20II CAM and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (6+1), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX
- With a score like 8.67 out of 10 (200g / 7,05oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa BG 6500X


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Daiwa BG 6500X vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Delphin INKS 2000X vs Penn Battle III 6000X
