Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Talica 20II CAM
Multireels
20ii Camx
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.64 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1 / 3.1:1
Maximum drag20kg / 44.09lbs
Weight920g / 32.45oz
Line retireve per crank104cm / 56cm
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €499.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size20II CAM
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofil-

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €661.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizePC 2500D-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX and Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX offers a ball bearings of 6+1, while Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX stands out for a weight of 170g / 6oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Talica 20II CAM and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (6+1), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX
- With a score like 8.87 out of 10 (170g / 6oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Shimano Ultegra C3000DX


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)
