Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Talica 20II CAM, 2-Speed, right hand, Multi fishing reel, TAC20IICAM
Shimano Talica 20II CAM
Multireels
20ii Camx
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.64 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1 / 3.1:1
Maximum drag20kg / 44.09lbs
Weight920g / 32.45oz
Line retireve per crank104cm / 56cm
Ball bearings6+1

Technical Specifications

  • BrandSHIMANO
  • The main category of the reelMultireels
  • Price range~ €499.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size20II CAM
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeLever drag
  • Handle orientationRight
  • Line capacity monofil-
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT, 2500 S-XH, left and right hand, Forellen Spinning fishing reel, Front Drag, 10307-201
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €199.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size2500 S-XH
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150

Conclusion

Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX edges out Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (20kg / 44,09lbs) and the line retrieve per crank (104cm / 56cm). Still, Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX holds its own with strengths like a weight of 195g / 6,88oz and a ergonomics of 6.35 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.

What's the difference between Shimano Talica 20II CAM and Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT?

There are not much differences between the two comparables