Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Talica 20II CAM, 2-Speed, right hand, Multi fishing reel, TAC20IICAM
Shimano Talica 20II CAM
Multireels
20ii Camx
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.64 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1 / 3.1:1
Maximum drag20kg / 44.09lbs
Weight920g / 32.45oz
Line retireve per crank104cm / 56cm
Ball bearings6+1

Technical Specifications

  • BrandSHIMANO
  • The main category of the reelMultireels
  • Price range~ €499.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size20II CAM
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeLever drag
  • Handle orientationRight
  • Line capacity monofil-
Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT, 3000-C, left and right hand, Match And Feeder Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 10217-305
Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT
Feeder And Match
63.10 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.06 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings4

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelFeeder and match
  • Price range~ €61.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size3000-C
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Conclusion

Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX clearly outshines Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX, offering significantly better performance in total score (9.5 out of 10) and line retrieve per crank (104cm / 56cm). While Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.

What's the difference between Shimano Talica 20II CAM and Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT?

There are not much differences between the two comparables