Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Talica 20II CAM
Multireels
20ii Camx
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.64 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1 / 3.1:1
Maximum drag20kg / 44.09lbs
Weight920g / 32.45oz
Line retireve per crank104cm / 56cm
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €499.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size20II CAM
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofil-

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
47.70 out of 100
Value for money2 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.07 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight280g / 9.88oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €71.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Conclusion
Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.2:1 / 3.1:1) and total score (9.5 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Talica 20II CAM and Shimano Sahara FJ?
Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX
- Higher gear ratio of 5.2:1 / 3.1:1 (scoring 9.4 out of 10), provides more speed meaning a better solution when quick retrieves really count
- Exceptional value at €499.33, this reel offers impressive performance for the price, making it a top pick for serious multireels anglers and pros
Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X
- With a score like 8.13 out of 10 (280g / 9,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Shimano Cardiff 301A
