Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Talica 20II CAM
Multireels
20ii Camx
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.64 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1 / 3.1:1
Maximum drag20kg / 44.09lbs
Weight920g / 32.45oz
Line retireve per crank104cm / 56cm
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €499.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size20II CAM
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofil-

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
55.50 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank66 centimeter / 25.98 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000FJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/140
Conclusion
Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX clearly outshines Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (104cm / 56cm) and maximum drag (20kg / 44,09lbs). While Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Talica 20II CAM and Shimano Sedona FJ?
Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.6 out of 10 (104cm / 56cm), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX
- With a score like 8.57 out of 10 (215g / 7,58oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Delphin ELIXIR 4000X vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Delphin ELIXIR 4000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X


Shimano Sienna 4000X vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX
