Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Talica II
Multireels
88.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.53 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank97 centimeter / 38.19 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €420.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size10II
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 20/270

Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD
Feeder And Match
90.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.51 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight455g / 16.05oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €312.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Talica II 10IIX and Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Talica II 10IIX offers a weight of 520g / 18,34oz, while Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD stands out for a gear ratio of 4.7:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Talica II and Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD?
Shimano Talica II 10IIX
- Scoring 8.27 out of 10 (520g / 18,34oz), this reel is impressively light for a multireel
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Shimano Beastmaster


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX
