Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Delphin SHARX 4000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Talica II
Multireels
88.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.53 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank97 centimeter / 38.19 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €420.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size10II
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 20/270

Delphin SHARX
Spinning
54.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.09 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight273g / 9.63oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €69.95
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/340
Conclusion
Shimano Talica II 10IIX clearly outshines Delphin SHARX 4000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (97 centimeter / 38.19 inch) and ball bearings (6). While Delphin SHARX 4000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Talica II 10IIX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Talica II and Delphin SHARX?
Shimano Talica II 10IIX
- At a maximum drag of 9kg / 19,84lbs (scoring 5.51 out of 10), the reel has a modest drag setup which is enough for smaller fish or relaxed situations where finesse matters more
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.13 out of 10 (97 centimeter / 38.19 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8 out of 10 (6), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Delphin SHARX 4000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
Similar comparisons

Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano 19 Stella 30000X


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Delphin INKS 3000X vs Shimano 19 Stella 30000X


Delphin INKS 3000X vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Shimano 19 Stella 30000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Delphin INKS 3000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Delphin INKS 3000X


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX
