Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Talica II
Multireels
88.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.53 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank97 centimeter / 38.19 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €420.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size10II
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 20/270

Penn Battle III
Spinning
69.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight785g / 27.7oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €127.60
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/335
Conclusion
Shimano Talica II 10IIX edges out Penn Battle III 8000 HSX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the line retrieve per crank (97 centimeter / 38.19 inch) and the weight (520g / 18,34oz). Still, Penn Battle III 8000 HSX holds its own with strengths like a gear ratio of 5.3:1 and a maximum drag of 13,6kg / 29,98lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Talica II and Penn Battle III?
Shimano Talica II 10IIX
- Scoring 8.27 out of 10 (520g / 18,34oz), this reel is impressively light for a multireel
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.13 out of 10 (97 centimeter / 38.19 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Penn Battle III 8000 HSX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX


Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa GS LTD 4000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Shimano Beastmaster


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX


Daiwa GS LTD 4000X vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX
