Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.
Shimano Talica II
Multireels
86.80 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag18kg / 39.68lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank104 centimeter / 40.94 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €519.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size16IIA
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 30/275
Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT
Feeder And Match
64.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.61 out of 10
Ergonomics5.97 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €72.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000-CP
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Shimano Talica II 16IIAX clearly outshines Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and line retrieve per crank (104 centimeter / 40.94 inch). While Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Talica II 16IIAX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Talica II and Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT?
Shimano Talica II 16IIAX
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- Rated 8.34 out of 10 (290g / 10,23oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
Similar comparisons
Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX
Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX
Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X
Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX
Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX
Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX
Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX
Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A
Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX
Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX
Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX
Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF
Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX
Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X
Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX
Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX
Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X