Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Talica II
Multireels
86.80 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag18kg / 39.68lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank104 centimeter / 40.94 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €519.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size16IIA
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 30/275

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
78.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.63 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €189.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Talica II 16IIAX and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Talica II 16IIAX offers a line retrieve per crank of 104 centimeter / 40.94 inch, while Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X stands out for a gear ratio of 5.1:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Talica II and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?
Shimano Talica II 16IIAX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.6 out of 10 (104 centimeter / 40.94 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500
