Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Talica II
Multireels
86.80 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag18kg / 39.68lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank104 centimeter / 40.94 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €519.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size16IIA
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 30/275

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
90.10 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.62 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €185.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Talica II 16IIAX and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Talica II 16IIAX offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX stands out for a gear ratio of 6.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Talica II and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?
Shimano Talica II 16IIAX
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.63 out of 10 (205g / 7,23oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Delphin HORNET 40X vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX


Delphin HORNET 40X vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Delphin HORNET 40X vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Delphin HORNET 40X
