Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Talica II
Multireels
86.80 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag18kg / 39.68lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank104 centimeter / 40.94 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €519.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size16IIA
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 30/275

Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750
Spinning
43.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank58 centimeter / 22.83 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeQC 750
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/100
Conclusion
Shimano Talica II 16IIAX clearly outshines Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and line retrieve per crank (104 centimeter / 40.94 inch). While Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Talica II 16IIAX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Talica II and Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750?
Shimano Talica II 16IIAX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.6 out of 10 (104 centimeter / 40.94 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8 out of 10 (6), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Shimano 19 Stella 30000X


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano 19 Stella 30000X


Shimano 19 Stella 30000X vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X
