Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Talica II
Multireels
86.80 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag18kg / 39.68lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank104 centimeter / 40.94 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €519.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size16IIA
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 30/275

Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750
Spinning
43.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank58 centimeter / 22.83 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeQC 750
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/100
Conclusion
Shimano Talica II 16IIAX clearly outshines Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and line retrieve per crank (104 centimeter / 40.94 inch). While Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Talica II 16IIAX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Talica II and Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750?
Shimano Talica II 16IIAX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.6 out of 10 (104 centimeter / 40.94 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8 out of 10 (6), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Shimano Catana 4000 RC


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano Beastmaster vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Shimano Catana 4000 RC
