Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Talica II
Multireels
86.80 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag18kg / 39.68lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank104 centimeter / 40.94 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €519.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size16IIA
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 30/275

Shimano AERO XR
Feeder And Match
78.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.1 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €121.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/130
Conclusion
Both Shimano Talica II 16IIAX and Shimano AERO XR 4000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Talica II 16IIAX offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Shimano AERO XR 4000X stands out for a gear ratio of 4.7. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Talica II and Shimano AERO XR?
Shimano Talica II 16IIAX
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Shimano AERO XR 4000X
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- Rated 8.6 out of 10 (245g / 8,64oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF
