Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A
Multireels
600 Hga Lc / Right Handx
67.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.59 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio6.3:1
Maximum drag10.8kg / 23,81lbs
Weight484g / 17.07oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €179.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size600 HGA LC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/274

Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT
Feeder And Match
64.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.61 out of 10
Ergonomics5.97 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €72.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000-CP
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX and Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX offers a durability of 8.59 out of 10, while Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX stands out for a gear ratio of 4.7:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A and Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT?
Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Delphin RAYA body vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Delphin RAYA body


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Delphin RAYA body vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX
